-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 165
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs(sinsp): fix some filter checks description #1665
docs(sinsp): fix some filter checks description #1665
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 172e50262e713a72ef2aa0a2a9f1d2f458e0d1a6
|
Signed-off-by: Andrea Terzolo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrea Terzolo <[email protected]>
154e4ad
to
5c2d959
Compare
rebased on master |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: b28eca08e71863babedbde4bc2819cd7cc7ed89f
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you!
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: Andreagit97, FedeDP, LucaGuerra The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What type of PR is this?
/kind documentation
Any specific area of the project related to this PR?
/area libsinsp
Does this PR require a change in the driver versions?
No
What this PR does / why we need it:
There are 2 main reasons behind this PR:
<>
notation is rendered as an HTML node in our documentation. We should avoid it. Something like:k8s.*
fields are now deprecated and so omitted in the documentation. We need to update the filter check class documentation.Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: